The concept
A classifier makes both false alarms and missed detections. Precision asks what fraction of positive predictions were correct. Recall asks what fraction of actual positive cases were found. Neither number alone establishes usefulness. Choosing a threshold requires an explicit account of the costs of each error and the capacity available to handle alerts.
Worked example
A fictional archive has 100 fragile documents among 1,000 items. A screening tool flags 80 items, including 60 fragile documents. Precision is 60 divided by 80, or 75 percent; recall is 60 divided by 100, or 60 percent. Forty fragile documents were missed. If lowering the threshold finds 20 more fragile documents but adds 150 false alarms, the conservation team must consider whether it has enough staff to examine the larger queue.
Limits and judgment
Accuracy can conceal this tradeoff when positive cases are rare. Predicting that every document is sturdy gives 90 percent accuracy here but finds none of the fragile items. Metrics should be calculated on representative cases and examined alongside a practical workflow, not used as decorative percentages.
FROM UNDERSTANDING TO ACTION
Put it to work.
Calculate precision and recall for 30 correct flags, 10 false flags, and 20 missed positives.
RETRIEVE. REASON. REMEMBER.
Knowledge check.
Choose one answer for each question, then check your reasoning.
Sources & further reading.
Links support the core concepts or identify the book. Examples, exercises, and critical analysis are original Institute material. Source checks are not an independent expert review of every claim.
- Google: Accuracy, recall and precision ↗
Core concept; scenario and analysis are original educational examples. Source reviewed 2026-10-19.